Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747341›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Drug discovery and mechanism prediction with explainable graph neural networks.

Conghao Wang, Gaurav Asok Kumar, Jagath C Rajapakse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Conghao WangCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Gaurav Asok KumarCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Jagath C RajapakseCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore. ASJagath@ntu.edu.sg.

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore AcRF Tier-1 grant RG14/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apprehension of drug action mechanism is paramount for drug response prediction and precision medicine. The unprecedented development of machine learning and deep learning algorithms has expedited the drug response prediction research. However, existing methods mainly focus on forward encoding of drugs, which is to obtain an accurate prediction of the response levels, but omitted to decipher the reaction mechanism between drug molecules and genes. We propose the eXplainable Graph-based Drug response Prediction (XGDP) approach that achieves a precise drug response prediction and reveals the comprehensive mechanism of action between drugs and their targets. XGDP represents drugs with molecular graphs, which naturally preserve the structural information of molecules and a Graph Neural Network module is applied to learn the latent features of molecules. Gene expression data from cancer cell lines are incorporated and processed by a Convolutional Neural Network module. A couple of deep learning attribution algorithms are leveraged to interpret interactions between drug molecular features and genes. We demonstrate that XGDP not only enhances the prediction accuracy compared to pioneering works but is also capable of capturing the salient functional groups of drugs and interactions with significant genes of cancer cells.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryNeural Networks, ComputerAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39747341
PMCPMC11696803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.