Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747289›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Harnessing CRISPR interference to resensitize laboratory strains and clinical isolates to last resort antibiotics.

Angelica Frusteri Chiacchiera, Michela Casanova, Massimo Bellato, Aurora Piazza, Roberta Migliavacca, Gregory Batt, Paolo Magni, Lorenzo Pasotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angelica Frusteri ChiacchieraDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, Pavia, Italy.
Michela CasanovaDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, Pavia, Italy.
Massimo BellatoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 63, Padua, 35121, Italy.
Aurora PiazzaDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Viale Brambilla 74, Pavia, Italy.
Roberta MigliavaccaDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Viale Brambilla 74, Pavia, Italy.
Gregory BattInstitut Pasteur, Inria, Université Paris Cité, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, France.
Paolo Magni *Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, Pavia, Italy.
Lorenzo Pasotti *Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, Pavia, Italy. lorenzo.pasotti@unipv.it.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche 20-PAMR-0010 (Seq2DiAg)Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo 59576 (2021)Institut Pasteur INCEPTIONRegione Lombardia 1139857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global race against antimicrobial resistance requires novel antimicrobials that are not only effective in killing specific bacteria, but also minimize the emergence of new resistances. Recently, CRISPR/Cas-based antimicrobials were proposed to address killing specificity with encouraging results. However, the emergence of target sequence mutations triggered by Cas-cleavage was identified as an escape strategy, posing the risk of generating new antibiotic-resistance gene (ARG) variants. Here, we evaluated an antibiotic re-sensitization strategy based on CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), which inhibits gene expression without damaging target DNA. The resistance to four antibiotics, including last resort drugs, was significantly reduced by individual and multi-gene targeting of ARGs in low- to high-copy numbers in recombinant E. coli. Escaper analysis confirmed the absence of mutations in target sequence, corroborating the harmless role of CRISPRi in the selection of new resistances. E. coli clinical isolates carrying ARGs of severe clinical concern were then used to assess the robustness of CRISPRi under different growth conditions. Meropenem, colistin and cefotaxime susceptibility was successfully increased in terms of MIC (up to > 4-fold) and growth delay (up to 11 h) in a medium-dependent fashion. ARG repression also worked in a pathogenic strain grown in human urine, as a demonstration of CRISPRi-mediated re-sensitization in host-mimicking media. This study laid the foundations for further leveraging CRISPRi as antimicrobial agent or research tool to selectively repress ARGs and investigate resistance mechanisms.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEscherichia coliDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic re-sensitizationAntimicrobial resistancebla ctx−M-typebla NDM-typeCRISPR arrayEscherichia coli clinical isolatesmcr-1

Identifiers

PMID39747289
PMCPMC11696610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.