ArticleScientific reports2025
Genome sequencing reveals novel variants in a diverse population with congenital anterior segment anomalies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health inequalities in precision medicine: A systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Application of next-generation sequencing to determine mutations in candidate genes for congenital eye malformations in the Mexican indigenous population.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital anterior segment anomalies are disorders that affect the development of the eye and cause severe visual impairment. The molecular basis of congenital anterior segment anomalies is not well known. In this study, genome sequencing was performed on 27 families from diverse ethnicities with congenital anterior segment anomalies and 11 variants were identified, most of which were novel and family specific. These variants included single nucleotide variants CPAMD8:c.4825 C > T, c.534 G > A, CRYBB1:c.683 C > A, NHS:c.1180 C > T, GJA3:c.176 C > T, CRYGC:c.470 G > A, COL2A1:c.2819 G > A, c.1693 C > T, EPHA2:c.2864 A > C, a splice donor variant in COL11A1:c.933 + 1del, and a copy number variant in FBN1. The observed inheritance patterns were predominantly dominant, with a few recessive cases and a single instance of X-linked inheritance. Genome sequencing identified variants in 40.74% of diverse cases, offering valuable insights for enhancing the diagnosis and management of this disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.