ArticleScientific reports2025
An automated privacy-preserving self-supervised classification of COVID-19 from lung CT scan images minimizing the requirements of large data annotation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An efficient dual path deep learning framework for COVID-19 classification using lung CT scans with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Privacy-preserving approach for IoT networks using statistical learning with optimization algorithm on high-dimensional big data environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel privacy-preserving self-supervised (SSL) framework for COVID-19 classification from lung CT scans, utilizing federated learning (FL) enhanced with Paillier homomorphic encryption (PHE) to prevent third-party attacks during training. The FL-SSL based framework employs two publicly available lung CT scan datasets which are considered as labeled and an unlabeled dataset. The unlabeled dataset is split into three subsets which are assumed to be collected from three hospitals. Training is done using the Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) contrastive learning SSL framework with a VGG19 encoder followed by attention CNN blocks (VGG19 + attention CNN). The input datasets are processed by selecting the largest lung portion of each lung CT scan using an automated selection approach and a 64 × 64 input size is utilized to reduce computational complexity. Healthcare privacy issues are addressed by collaborative training across decentralized datasets and secure aggregation with PHE, underscoring the effectiveness of this approach. Three subsets of the dataset are used to train the local BYOL model, which together optimizes the central encoder. The labeled dataset is employed to train the central encoder (updated VGG19 + attention CNN), resulting in an accuracy of 97.19%, a precision of 97.43%, and a recall of 98.18%. The reliability of the framework's performance is demonstrated through statistical analysis and five-fold cross-validation. The efficacy of the proposed framework is further showcased by showing its performance on three distinct modality datasets: skin cancer, breast cancer, and chest X-rays. In conclusion, this study offers a promising solution for accurate diagnosis of chest X-rays, preserving privacy and overcoming the challenges of dataset scarcity and computational complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.