Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747167›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Production and properties of particleboard and paper from waste poppy straw.

Kateřina Hájková, Tomáš Holeček, Michaela Filipi, Josef Bárta, Adam Sikora, Uğur Özkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kateřina HájkováFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 165 00, Czech Republic. hajkovakaterina@fld.czu.cz.
Tomáš HolečekFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Michaela FilipiFaculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, University of Pardubice, Studentská 572, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic.
Josef BártaFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Adam SikoraFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Uğur ÖzkanFaculty of Forestry, Isparta university of Applied Science, Isparta Merkez/Isparta, Çünür, 32260, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the scarcity of wood in some countries, it is necessary to replace it with other raw materials and at the same time use the waste material. The aim of this research is to use poppy waste straw for the efficient conversion of possible lignocellulosic materials - pulps and particleboards. Their suitability for the production of composites is assessed on the basis of selected physical or mechanical properties. Tensile strength index, burst strength index and air permeability by Gurley have been identified as critical properties of pulp made from poppy straw through two delignification methods. The better mechanical properties, i.e., tensile strength index, were achieved at 52.7 N·m/g for the sodium pulp, but the nitrate-alkali method also showed corresponding values at 45.9 N·m/g. Similar parameters to those of bagasse or similar fast-growing plants were achieved in particleboard production. The results of this research are used to evaluate poppy straw as an alternative raw material to produce biocomposites.

Indexed as

Mechanical propertiesNitrate-alkaline pulpParticleboardPoppy strawSoda pulp

Identifiers

PMID39747167
PMCPMC11695947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.