Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predictive modeling of soil profiles for precision agriculture: a case study in safflower cultivation environments.

Megha Sharma, Shailendra Goel, Ani A Elias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megha SharmaDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8488-350X
Shailendra GoelDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8731-8892
Ani A EliasICFRE-Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. anianna01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-6979

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India Ramalingaswami fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating high-throughput soil profile information is essential in safflower precision agriculture, as it facilitates efficient resource management and design of an experiment that promotes sustainable production. We collected soil from representative target environments (TE) of safflower cultivation and evaluated 14 soil physio-chemical features for constructing fine-resolution maps. The robustness, versatility, and predictive ability of two statistical learning models in correctly classifying the soil profile to clusters were tested. Calcium, sand, soil organic carbon, phosphorous, potassium, and sodium were found to be most influential in classifying the representative TE. Random Forest model was found to be the best performing with average prediction accuracy above 85% in all test settings which reached 100% in some. The optimal training population size for prediction was found to be 70-80%. The spatial distribution of sodium in Delhi was found to be aligned with the low yield of safflower emphasizing the importance of fine-resolution soil mapping to design a field experiment and optimize the nutrient supply. Fine-resolution mapping not only enhance soil management strategies but also support government initiatives such as soil health cards, delineation of cultivable land, and risk assessments in crop-growing areas.

Indexed as

Fine-resolution soil mapPrecision agricultureRandom forestSafflowerSelf-organizing mapSoil prediction model

Identifiers

PMID39747163
PMCPMC11696571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.