ArticleScientific reports2025
A comprehensive analysis of advanced solar panel productivity and efficiency through numerical models and emotional neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the performance of FAPbIRSC advances · 2026Article
- Investigating solar air collector performance with different absorber surfaces and Piranha fins through numerical simulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electron extraction layer-driven performance enhancement in CaHfSeRSC advances · 2025Article
- Coupled DFT and SCAPS-1D investigation of a novel small-molecule for organic solar cells.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the performance of a standard 200 W solar cell, focusing on the energy and exergy aspects. A significant research gap exists in the comprehensive integration of numerical models with advanced machine-learning approaches, specifically emotional artificial neural networks (EANN), to simulate and optimize the electrical characteristics and efficiency of solar panels. To address this gap, a numerical model alongside a novel EANN was employed to simulate the system's electrical characteristics, including open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, system resistances, maximum power point characteristics, and characteristic curves. Mathematical equations for calculating efficiency levels under varying operational conditions were developed. The system's operational and electrical parameters, alongside environmental conditions such as solar radiation, wind speed, and ambient temperature, were empirically observed and documented over a day. A comparative analysis was conducted to validate the model by comparing its results with manufacturer data and experimental observations. During the trial from 7:00 to 17:00, energy efficiency varied from 10.34 to 14.00%, averaging 13.6%, while exergy efficiency ranged from 13.57 to 16.41%, with an average of 15.70%. The results from the EANN model indicate that the proposed method for forecasting energy, exergy, and power is feasible, offering a significant reduction in computational expense compared to traditional numerical models. The integration of numerical modeling with EANN enhances simulation accuracy and the developed equations enable real-time efficiency calculations. Empirical validation under varying environmental conditions improves predictive capabilities for solar panel performance. Additionally, operational efficiency assessments aid in better design and deployment of solar energy systems, and computational costs for large-scale solar energy simulations are reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.