ArticleScientific reports2024
Non-invasive 4D transcranial functional ultrasound and ultrasound localization microscopy for multimodal imaging of neurovascular response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current applications and challenges of artificial intelligence applied to diagnostics in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Fast 3-D Ultrasound Localization Microscopy via Projection-Based Processing Framework.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Learning feature dependencies for precise tumor region detection and segmentation in optical coherence tomography images.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Low-temperature embryo incubation suppresses off-target mutagenesis during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in medaka (Oryzias latipes) and zebrafish (Danio rerio).Transgenic research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A long-standing goal of neuroimaging is the non-invasive volumetric assessment of whole brain function and structure at high spatial and temporal resolutions. Functional ultrasound (fUS) and ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) are rapidly emerging techniques that promise to bring advanced brain imaging and therapy to the clinic with the safety and low-cost advantages associated with ultrasound. fUS has been used to study cerebral hemodynamics at high temporal resolutions while ULM has been used to study cerebral microvascular structure at high spatial resolutions. These two methods have complementary spatio-temporal characteristics, making them ideally suited for multimodal imaging, but both suffer from limitations associated with transcranial ultrasound imaging. Here, these two methods are combined on the same data acquisition, completely non-invasively, using contrast-enhancements, which solves the dual challenges of sensitivity during transcranial imaging and the ability to implement super-resolution. From this combined approach, the cerebral blood flow, activated brain region, brain connectivity, vessel diameter, and vessel velocity were all calculated from the same data acquisition. During stimulation periods, there was a statistically significant (p<0.0001) increase in cerebral blood flow, diameter, and global velocity, but a decrease in velocity in the activated region. Additionally, the global flow increased (p=0.11) and connectivity decreased (24.7%) when compared to baseline. This multimodal approach allows for the study of the relationship between cerebral hemodynamics (30 ms resolution) and the microvasculature (14.6 μm resolution) using one ultrasound scan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.