ArticleNature communications2025
ImageDoubler: image-based doublet identification in single-cell sequencing.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell sequencing provides detailed insights into individual cell behaviors within complex systems based on the assumption that each cell is uniquely isolated. However, doublets-where two or more cells are sequenced together-disrupt this assumption and can lead to potential data misinterpretations. Traditional doublet detection methods primarily rely on simulated genomic data, which may be less effective in homogeneous cell populations and can introduce biases from experimental processes. Therefore, we introduce ImageDoubler in this study, an innovative image-based model that identifies doublets and missing samples leveraging the Fluidigm single-cell sequencing image data. Our approach showcases a notable doublet detection efficacy, achieving a rate up to 93.87% and registering a minimum improvement of 33.1% in F1 scores compared to existing genomic-based methods. This advancement highlights the potential of using imaging to glean insight into developing doublet detection algorithms and exposes the limitations inherent in current genomic-based techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.