Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747037›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Verifiable measurement-based quantum random sampling with trapped ions.

Martin Ringbauer, Marcel Hinsche, Thomas Feldker, Paul K Faehrmann, Juani Bermejo-Vega, Claire L Edmunds, Lukas Postler, Roman Stricker, Christian D Marciniak, Michael Meth and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martin RingbauerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria. martin.ringbauer@uibk.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-6240
Marcel HinscheDahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-5706
Thomas FeldkerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.
Paul K FaehrmannDahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Juani Bermejo-VegaDahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claire L EdmundsUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-9074
Lukas PostlerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roman StrickerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-1487
Christian D MarciniakUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-3981
Michael MethUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ivan PogorelovUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5103-9410
Rainer BlattUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp SchindlerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-9650
Jens EisertDahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-1292
Thomas MonzUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-4804
Dominik HangleiterJoint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (QuICS), University of Maryland & NIST, College Park, MD, USA. mail@dhangleiter.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-7967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum computers are now on the brink of outperforming their classical counterparts. One way to demonstrate the advantage of quantum computation is through quantum random sampling performed on quantum computing devices. However, existing tools for verifying that a quantum device indeed performed the classically intractable sampling task are either impractical or not scalable to the quantum advantage regime. The verification problem thus remains an outstanding challenge. Here, we experimentally demonstrate efficiently verifiable quantum random sampling in the measurement-based model of quantum computation on a trapped-ion quantum processor. We create and sample from random cluster states, which are at the heart of measurement-based computing, up to a size of 4 × 4 qubits. By exploiting the structure of these states, we are able to recycle qubits during the computation to sample from entangled cluster states that are larger than the qubit register. We then efficiently estimate the fidelity to verify the prepared states-in single instances and on average-and compare our results to cross-entropy benchmarking. Finally, we study the effect of experimental noise on the certificates. Our results and techniques provide a feasible path toward a verified demonstration of a quantum advantage.

Identifiers

PMID39747037
PMCPMC11695993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.