Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746988›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Globally scalable glacier mapping by deep learning matches expert delineation accuracy.

Konstantin A Maslov, Claudio Persello, Thomas Schellenberger, Alfred Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantin A MaslovDepartment of Earth Observation Science, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Overijssel, The Netherlands. k.a.maslov@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9616-4979
Claudio PerselloDepartment of Earth Observation Science, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Overijssel, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-5398
Thomas SchellenbergerDepartment of Geosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Østlandet, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-3700
Alfred SteinDepartment of Earth Observation Science, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Overijssel, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-1233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate global glacier mapping is critical for understanding climate change impacts. Despite its importance, automated glacier mapping at a global scale remains largely unexplored. Here we address this gap and propose Glacier-VisionTransformer-U-Net (GlaViTU), a convolutional-transformer deep learning model, and five strategies for multitemporal global-scale glacier mapping using open satellite imagery. Assessing the spatial, temporal and cross-sensor generalisation shows that our best strategy achieves intersection over union  >0.85 on previously unobserved images in most cases, which drops to  >0.75 for debris-rich areas such as High-Mountain Asia and increases to  >0.90 for regions dominated by clean ice. A comparative validation against human expert uncertainties in terms of area and distance deviations underscores GlaViTU performance, approaching or matching expert-level delineation. Adding synthetic aperture radar data, namely, backscatter and interferometric coherence, increases the accuracy in all regions where available. The calibrated confidence for glacier extents is reported making the predictions more reliable and interpretable. We also release a benchmark dataset that covers 9% of glaciers worldwide. Our results support efforts towards automated multitemporal and global glacier mapping.

Identifiers

PMID39746988
PMCPMC11695715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.