Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746987›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

A Bayesian active learning platform for scalable combination drug screens.

Christopher Tosh, Mauricio Tec, Jessica B White, Jeffrey F Quinn, Glorymar Ibanez Sanchez, Paul Calder, Andrew L Kung, Filemon S Dela Cruz, Wesley Tansey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Antibacterial activity and mechanism of the antiparasitic drug resorantel againstZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher ToshComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mauricio TecDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica B WhiteComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-8383
Jeffrey F QuinnComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-9957
Glorymar Ibanez SanchezDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Paul CalderDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew L KungDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9091-488X
Filemon S Dela CruzDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-5191
Wesley TanseyComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. tanseyw@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-4228

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Center for Tumor-Immune Systems Biology at MSKCCU54CA274492 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Christina S Leslie · 2022 to 2026
$16.3M
Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology & MedicineT32GM132083 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Doron Betel, Iman Hajirasouliha · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Probabilistic Multiscale Modeling of the Tumor MicroenvironmentR37CA271186 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Wesley Tansey · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R37 CA271186NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274492NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132083U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) R37 CA271186, U54CA274492, P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale combination drug screens are generally considered intractable due to the immense number of possible combinations. Existing approaches use ad hoc fixed experimental designs then train machine learning models to impute unobserved combinations. Here we propose BATCHIE, an orthogonal approach that conducts experiments dynamically in batches. BATCHIE uses information theory and probabilistic modeling to design each batch to be maximally informative based on the results of previous experiments. On retrospective experiments from previous large-scale screens, BATCHIE designs rapidly discover highly effective and synergistic combinations. In a prospective combination screen of a library of 206 drugs on a collection of pediatric cancer cell lines, the BATCHIE model accurately predicts unseen combinations and detects synergies after exploring only 4% of the 1.4M possible experiments. Further, the model identifies a panel of top combinations for Ewing sarcomas, which follow-up validation experiments confirm to be effective, including the rational and translatable top hit of PARP plus topoisomerase I inhibition. These results demonstrate that adaptive experiments can enable large-scale unbiased combination drug screens with a relatively small number of experiments. BATCHIE is open source and publicly available ( https://github.com/tansey-lab/batchie ).

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremSarcoma, EwingAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug SynergismHumansMachine LearningAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39746987
PMCPMC11696745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.