Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746670›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2025

Validation of the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children (MESC) with ambulatory circadian monitoring of temperature, light exposure and activity.

Yaiza Puig-Navarro, Juan F Díaz-Morales

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaiza Puig-NavarroIndividual Differences, Work and Social Psychology Department, Complutense University of Madrid; R&D department, Hogrefe TEA Ediciones, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-4108
Juan F Díaz-MoralesIndividual Differences, Work and Social Psychology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3894-7908

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-116600RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The external validity of the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children was analysed via objective measures of skin temperature, light exposure and motor activity with the ambulatory circadian monitoring methodology. A total of 138 adolescents (57 boys and 81 girls) aged 12-13 years, who in addition to completing the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children to determine their circadian typology wore a wrist activity device (Kronowise 3.0; Kronohealth SL) during school days and a weekend, participated. Circadian parameters, such as mesor, amplitude and acrophase, were estimated for skin temperature, light exposure and motor activity, as were sleep parameters, such as risetime, bedtime and social jetlag. The results indicated that during the weekend E-type adolescents experienced later acrophases in temperature, light and activity than I-type and M-type adolescents did, whereas boys experienced earlier acrophases in temperature and activity. When school weekdays were compared with the weekend, there was a weekend delay in the acrophases of temperature (1:03), light exposure (2:03) and activity (3:15). The results obtained in this study provide external validity for applying the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children in the naturalistic context of high school while considering sex and type-of-day differences as important variables in chronopsychological studies.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmLightMonitoring, AmbulatoryMotor ActivityAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSkin TemperatureSleepTemperatureadolescentscircadian parameterscircadian preferencesleep parameters

Identifiers

PMID39746670
PMCPMC12215289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.