ArticleUltrasonics2025
Overfit detection method for deep neural networks trained to beamform ultrasound images.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Ultrasound Beamforming With Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Datasets, Benchmarks, and Computational Challenges.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have remarkable potential to reconstruct ultrasound images. However, this promise can suffer from overfitting to training data, which is typically detected via loss function monitoring during an otherwise time-consuming training process or via access to new sources of test data. We present a method to detect overfitting with associated evaluation approaches that only require knowledge of a network architecture and associated trained weights. Three types of artificial DNN inputs (i.e., zeros, ones, and Gaussian noise), unseen during DNN training, were input to three DNNs designed for ultrasound image formation, trained on multi-site data, and submitted to the Challenge on Ultrasound Beamforming with Deep Learning (CUBDL). Overfitting was detected using these artificial DNN inputs. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of DNN-created images to ground truth images immediately revealed signs of overfitting (e.g., zeros input produced mean output values ≥0.08, ones input produced mean output values ≤0.07, with corresponding image-to-image normalized correlations ≤0.8). The proposed approach is promising to detect overfitting without requiring lengthy network retraining or the curation of additional test data. Potential applications include sanity checks during federated learning, as well as optimization, security, public policy, regulation creation, and benchmarking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.