ArticleJMIR AI2025
Enhancing Interpretable, Transparent, and Unobtrusive Detection of Acute Marijuana Intoxication in Natural Environments: Harnessing Smart Devices and Explainable AI to Empower Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions: Longitudinal Observational Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Emotion-Adaptive Large Language Model-Driven Clinical Decision Support: User Evaluation of the Empathic Clinical Decision Support System Framework for Trust and Explainability.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute marijuana intoxication can impair motor skills and cognitive functions such as attention and information processing. However, traditional tests, like blood, urine, and saliva, fail to accurately detect acute marijuana intoxication in real time.
objectiveThis study aims to explore whether integrating smartphone-based sensors with readily accessible wearable activity trackers, like Fitbit, can enhance the detection of acute marijuana intoxication in naturalistic settings. No previous research has investigated the effectiveness of passive sensing technologies for enhancing algorithm accuracy or enhancing the interpretability of digital phenotyping through explainable artificial intelligence in real-life scenarios. This approach aims to provide insights into how individuals interact with digital devices during algorithmic decision-making, particularly for detecting moderate to intensive marijuana intoxication in real-world contexts.
methodsSensor data from smartphones and Fitbits, along with self-reported marijuana use, were collected from 33 young adults over a 30-day period using the experience sampling method. Participants rated their level of intoxication on a scale from 1 to 10 within 15 minutes of consuming marijuana and during 3 daily semirandom prompts. The ratings were categorized as not intoxicated (0), low (1-3), and moderate to intense intoxication (4-10). The study analyzed the performance of models using mobile phone data only, Fitbit data only, and a combination of both (MobiFit) in detecting acute marijuana intoxication.
resultsThe eXtreme Gradient Boosting Machine classifier showed that the MobiFit model, which combines mobile phone and wearable device data, achieved 99% accuracy (area under the curve=0.99; F
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of using smartphone sensors and wearable devices for interpretable, transparent, and unobtrusive monitoring of acute marijuana intoxication in daily life. Advanced algorithmic decision-making provides valuable insight into behavioral, physiological, and environmental factors that could support timely interventions to reduce marijuana-related harm. Future real-world applications of these algorithms should be evaluated in collaboration with clinical experts to enhance their practicality and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.