Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746186›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2025

Hemodynamic Management Guided by the Hypotension Prediction Index in Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Javier Ripollés-Melchor, José L Tomé-Roca, Andrés Zorrilla-Vaca, César Aldecoa, María J Colomina, Eva Bassas-Parga, Juan V Lorente, Alicia Ruiz-Escobar, Laura Carrasco-Sánchez, Marc Sadurni-Sarda and 38 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07510451 (The Hypotension Prediction Index Software Compared With Standard Advanced Haemodynamic Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Major Aortic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07510451 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Hypotension Prediction Index Software Compared With Standard Advanced Haemodynamic Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Major Aortic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Medical SciencesRan2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsElective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Surgery With an Expected Surgical Duration Exceeding 2 Hours, Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery With an Expected Surgical Duration Exceeding 2 HoursArmsHPI guided heamodynamic monitoring, Standard Heamodynamic Managament according to APCO Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors.

Javier Ripollés-MelchorInfanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-9316
José L Tomé-RocaFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Andrés Zorrilla-VacaDepartment of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
César AldecoaFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
María J ColominaFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Bassas-PargaDepartment of Anesthesia, Moisès Broggi University Hospital, Sant Joan Despí, Spain.
Juan V LorenteFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva, Spain.
Alicia Ruiz-EscobarDepartment of Anesthesia, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Carrasco-SánchezFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain; Doctoral Program in Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain; Institute of Research and Innovation in Life and Health Sciences in Central Catalonia, Vic, Spain.
Marc Sadurni-SardaDepartment of Anesthesia, Del Mar University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva RivasDepartment of Anesthesia, Barcelona Clinic Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume PuigUniversity General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Valencia University, Valencia, Spain.
Elizabeth Agudelo-MontoyaDepartment of Anesthesia, University Hospital Complex of Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain.
Sabela Del Rio-FernándezDepartment of Anesthesia, University Hospital Complex of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Daniel García-LópezDepartment of Anesthesia, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.
Ana B Adell-PérezDepartment of Anesthesia, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain.
Antonio GuillenDepartment of Anesthesia, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rocío Venturoli-OjedaDepartment of Anesthesia, Jerez de la Frontera University Hospital, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.
Bartolomé Fernández-TorresDepartment of Anesthesia, Virgen de la Macarena University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.
Ane Abad-MotosDepartment of Anesthesia, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain.
Irene MojarroDepartment of Anesthesia, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva, Spain.
José L Garrido-CalmaestraDepartment of Anesthesia, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Jesús Fernanz-AntónDepartment of Anesthesia, Moisès Broggi University Hospital, Sant Joan Despí, Spain.
Ana Pedregosa-SanzDepartment of Anesthesia, Igualada University Hospital, Igualada, Spain.
Luisa Cueva-CastroDepartment of Anesthesia, Sant Pau University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Miren A Echevarria-CorreasDepartment of Anesthesia, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Montserrat MallolDepartment of Anesthesia, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain.
María M Olvera-GarcíaDepartment of Anesthesia, San Cecilio University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Rosalía Navarro-PérezDepartment of Anesthesia, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Paula Fernández-Valdés-BangoDepartment of Anesthesia, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier García-FernándezPuerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; Department of Anesthesia, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel V EspinosaFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Hussein Abu KhudairKing Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Ángel Becerra-BolañosDoctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Yolanda Díez-RemesalDepartment of Anesthesia, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
María A Fuentes-PraderaDepartment of Anesthesia, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.
Miguel A Valbuena-BuenoDepartment of Anesthesia, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute, Sabadell, Spain.
Begoña Quintana-Villamandos
Jordi Llorca-GarcíaAlthaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain.
Ignacio Fernández-LópezDepartment of Anesthesia, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro Ocón-MorenoDepartment of Anesthesia, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Sandra L Martín-InfantesDepartment of Anesthesia, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Javier M Valiente-LourtauDepartment of Anesthesia, Virgen de la Macarena University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.
Marta Amelburu-EgoscozabalDepartment of Anesthesia, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain.
Hugo Rivera-RamosDepartment of Anesthesia, Del Mar University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo Abad-GurumetaInfanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel I Monge-GarcíaFluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain; Department of Intensive Care, Jerez de la Frontera University Hospital, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.
HYT Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after major abdominal surgery leads to poor outcomes. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI; Edwards Lifesciences, USA) may aid in managing intraoperative hemodynamic instability. This study assessed whether HPI-guided therapy reduces moderate-to-severe AKI incidence in moderate- to high-risk elective abdominal surgery patients.

methodsThis multicenter randomized trial was conducted from October 2022 to February 2024 across 28 hospitals evaluating HPI-guided management compared to a wide range of real-world hemodynamic approaches. A total of 917 patients (65 yr or older or older than 18 yr with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status greater than II) undergoing moderate- to high-risk elective abdominal surgery were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. HPI-guided management triggered interventions when the HPI exceeded 80, using fluids and/or vasopressors/inotropes based on hemodynamic data. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe AKI within the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included overall complications, the need for renal replacement therapy, duration of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality.

resultsMedian age was 71 yr (interquartile range, 65 to 77) in the HPI group and 70 yr (interquartile range, 63 to 76) in standard care group. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III/IV was 58.3% (268 of 459) in the HPI group and 57.9% (263 of 458) in standard care group. The incidence of moderate-to-severe AKI was 6.1% (28 of 459) in the HPI group and 7.0% (32 of 458) in the standard care group (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.49; P = 0.66). Overall complications occurred in 31.9% (146 of 459) of the HPI group and 29.7% (136 of 458) of the standard care group (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = 0.52). The incidence of renal replacement therapy did not differ between groups. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range, 4 to 10) in both groups. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (5 of 459) in the HPI group versus 0.9% (4 of 458) in standard care group (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.36 to 5.10; P = 0.66).

conclusionsHPI-guided hemodynamic therapy did not reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI or overall complications compared to standard care.

Indexed as

AbdomenAcute Kidney InjuryHemodynamicsHypotensionPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39746186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.