ArticlePloS one2025
Rifampicin and isoniazid resistance not promote fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a point-of-care dual one-step recombinase-aided PCR assay for rapid identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Correction: Rifampicin and isoniazid resistance not promote fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of drug-resistant Tuberculosis (TB) has made treatment challenging. Although fluoroquinolones (FQs) are used as key drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), the problem of FQs resistance is becoming increasingly serious. Rifampicin (RIF) resistance is considered a risk factor for FQs resistance. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of RIF and isoniazid (INH) resistance on the FQs resistance in vitro experiment.
methodsFQs resistant strains were selected in vitro from RIF and/or INH resistant Mycobacterium smegmatis (M.sm). The sequencing of the gyrA gene, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of FQs (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin) were performed for FQs-resistant strains.
resultsA total of 222 FQs-resistant M.sm strains were selected, all of which had the gyrA mutation. Seven gyrA mutations were detected, with mutations at loci 90 and 94 being the most common. There were no differences in FQs resistance developed from RIF and/or INH resistant M.sm. There was a significant difference in the MIC of the gyrA mutant types to FQs. The highest resistance to FQs was observed in the Gly88Cys mutant strains. M.sm with the identical gyrA mutation showed the highest resistance to ciprofloxacin and relatively low resistance to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin.
conclusionsIn this study, we found no evidence that RIF and/or INH resistance directly affects FQs resistance in M.sm in vitro experiments. Resistance profiles of different gryA mutations to the four FQs drugs were also presented. These findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of FQs resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.