Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746085›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Techno-structural and 3-D geometric morphometric analysis applied for investigating the variability of Holocene unifacial tools in tropical Central Brazil.

Marina González-Varas, Antoine Lourdeau, Letícia Gonçalves, Rafael Lemos de Souza, Diego Teixeira Mendes, Tatyana Beltrão de Oliveira, Gustavo Furlaneto Silva, Hubert Forestier, Rolando Romero, Antonio Pérez-Balarezo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marina González-VarasDépartement Homme & Environnement, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7194 HNHP, Équipe PRÉTROP, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9471-2487
Antoine LourdeauDépartement Homme & Environnement, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7194 HNHP, Équipe PRÉTROP, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-7953
Letícia GonçalvesInstituto Goiano de Pré-História e Antropologia (IGPA), Pontificia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO), Goiânia, Brasil.
Rafael Lemos de SouzaMuseu Antropológico da Universidade Federal da Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brasil.
Diego Teixeira MendesMuseu Antropológico da Universidade Federal da Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brasil.
Tatyana Beltrão de OliveiraMuseu Antropológico da Universidade Federal da Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brasil.
Gustavo Furlaneto SilvaMuseu Antropológico da Universidade Federal da Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brasil.
Hubert ForestierDépartement Homme & Environnement, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7194 HNHP, Équipe PRÉTROP, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.
Rolando RomeroUniversidad Tecnológica del Perú, Chiclayo, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0003-1100-1087
Antonio Pérez-BalarezoDépartement Homme & Environnement, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7194 HNHP, Équipe PRÉTROP, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-6916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene and in the early Holocene period, hunter-gatherer communities across tropical South America deployed a range of technological strategies to adapt to diverse environmental conditions. This period witnessed a rich tapestry of technological practices, from enduring, widely disseminated tools to local and sporadically utilized technologies, shaping a multifaceted landscape of technological traditions. Lithic technology during this period was mainly marked by localized sourcing of raw materials, the use of multifunctional tools, a variety of projectile point designs, and the frequently utilization of unifacial shaping technology. In tropical Central Brazil, the Itaparica technocomplex, with unique unifacial lithic tools like limaces, is a pivotal innovation from the Late Pleistocene through the Holocene. However, the factors influencing their morphological and structural variability remain largely unexplored, obscuring our understanding of their ergonomics and their role as mediators between humans and tropical environments. This study hypothesizes that the variability observed within and among unifacial tools from the GO-Ni sites in Central Brazil is a result of a combination of factors, including raw material availability and functional and ergonomic requirements. To test this hypothesis, a study of 67 unifacial tools from this region was conducted, employing techno-structural analysis and 3D geometric morphometrics. This approach was designed to precisely quantify tool geometry and uncover their functional potentials. The analysis revealed significant variability within the techno-structural groups, often intersecting with typological classifications. These results indicate that despite their production attributes, unifacially shaped artifacts demonstrate considerable morpho-structural diversity. The study delineated nine distinct techno-structural groups, each suggesting potentially different functional organizations and deviating from conventional typologies. These results indicate that unifacially shaped artifacts, while embodying a novel technological paradigm of production, exhibit a broader spectrum of variation mainly due to different tool functions. The combined approach adopted in this research highlights on the cultural significance of unifacial tools within Paleoamerican technological systems. It suggests probable unique tool concepts specific to the study area, challenges existing classifications, and enriches our comprehension of early lithic technology in South America.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBrazilHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTechnology

Identifiers

PMID39746085
PMCPMC11695013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.