ArticlePloS one2025
Contribution of paranasal sinus, chest, and abdomen/pelvis computed tomography in patients with febrile neutropenia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact of Sinus CT Surveillance Imaging among Febrile Neutropenic Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFebrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious clinical event, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Imaging has a central role in the identification of the fever cause. The study objectives were to assess abnormalities of potential infectious origin on paranasal sinus, chest and abdomen/pelvis CT scans performed during an episode of FN, in patients with or without specific clinical signs, and to evaluate their impact on the frequency of changes in treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 306 patients with FN from a single academic center between October 2018 and December 2019. Clinical and biological data, final clinical diagnosis for the FN episode, and change in treatment following CT scans were collected from medical records. CT images were reviewed for positive findings in each anatomical region.
resultsOverall, 188 patients (61.4%) had at least one positive CT finding on paranasal sinus, chest and/or abdomen/pelvis regions, and 153 patients (50.0%) received a final clinical diagnosis of infection, based on microbiological and/or radiological findings. There were more chest and abdomen/pelvis CT positive findings in patients with specific clinical signs than in patients without (65.7% vs. 25.8%, and 59.0% vs. 22.7% respectively, p <0.001), with a higher frequency of therapeutic modifications in positive CTs. There were significantly more paranasal sinus CT abnormalities in symptomatic patients (33.3% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.03), but without any impact on treatment.
conclusionThese results support recommendations to perform systematic chest CT in patients with FN and may encourage the widespread use of abdomen/pelvis CT in this indication, even without symptoms. However, the actual impact of their use on the prognosis of the patients remains to be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.