ArticlePloS one2025
Day-to-day dynamics of fetal heart rate variability to detect chorioamnionitis in preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChorioamnionitis is recognized as a major consequence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), and a frequent cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The association between fetal heart rate (FHR) and chorioamnionitis remains unclear.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of FHR in a PPROM population at the approach of delivery according to the presence or absence of chorioamnionitis. MATERIALS &
methods120 pregnant women with PPROM between 26 and 34 weeks' gestation were enrolled in this multicenter prospective unblinded study. All participants were fully informed of the study's objectives. 39 of the 120 patients were included in the analysis of FHR recordings. The analysis consisted of extracting features from computerized FHR analysis (cFHR) and fetal heart rate variability analysis (FHRV) in the temporal, frequency and nonlinear domains. Then, each set of features was analyzed separately using the multiple factor analysis, where three groups were defined as the feature set for days 0, -1 and -2 prior to birth. The distances between the global projection and the projections for each day were computed and used in the ROC analysis to distinguish chorioamnionitis from non-chorioamnionitis group.
resultsThe results showed that there were significant differences in certain features between populations with and without chorioamnionitis. The distinction between the two populations reached an area under the curve (AUC) of only 37% [34-40] for cFHR features and 63% [59-66] for time-domain FHRV features when comparing all stages of chorioamnionitis to non-chorioamnionitis subjects. When only stage 3 chorioamnionitis was compared to non-chorioamnionitis patients, the AUC reached 90% [88-93] for nonlinear-domain and 84% [82-87] for time-domain FHRV features, whereas it was limited to 71% [68-74] using cFHR features.
conclusionThe present study suggests that the HRV features are more reliable for diagnosing chorioamnionitis than cFHR, and that the assessment of features dynamics over several days is an interesting tool for detecting chorioamnionitis. Further study should be carried out on a larger sample to confirm these findings, improve the diagnostic performance of chorioamnionitis and help clinicians decide on delivery criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.