ArticleJournal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention2025
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Improve Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral.
Article in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInadequate referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a major barrier to CR participation. We investigated the implementation of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on improving CR referral for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at an academic medical center.
methodsWe developed a CDS tool that identified patients admitted with AMI and reminded physicians to refer patients to CR. We used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to evaluate predictors of CR referral prior to the CDS tool. We then conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis on CR referral rates before and after intervention.
resultsA total of 1985 patients admitted with acute MI from December 2014 through March 2023 were included. Prior to CDS implementation, 1218 of 1657 patients (74%) were referred to CR. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on arrival (OR = 1.70: 95% CI, 1.29-2.23, P < .001) and percutaneous coronary intervention during the hospitalization (OR = 2.25: 95% CI, 1.60-3.15, P < .001) were associated with a higher odds of CR referral. After implementation of the CDS tool, 308 of 328 patients (94%) received CR referrals. An ITS analysis demonstrated that the increase in CR referral from 74-94% after the CDS tool was highly significant (P < .01).
conclusionsThe implementation of a CDS tool reminding physicians to refer patients with AMI to CR markedly improved CR referral rates at our institution. These findings are important for institutions seeking to improve outcomes in patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.