ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting learning achievement using ensemble learning with result explanation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TransBreast-Net: An interpretable vision transformer ensemble for breast cancer histopathology classification.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Urine-Based cfDNA Ensemble Modeling for Early Detection of Bladder Cancer Using Whole-Genome Methylation Sequencing.Cancers · 2026Article
- Research on Prediction of Preterm Birth Risk Based on Digital Twin Technology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An optimized EfficientNetB7 deep learning model for lung cancer tissue pathology image recognition.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification Model for Pediatric Maxillofacial Morphology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting learning achievement is a crucial strategy to address high dropout rates. However, existing prediction models often exhibit biases, limiting their accuracy. Moreover, the lack of interpretability in current machine learning methods restricts their practical application in education. To overcome these challenges, this research combines the strengths of various machine learning algorithms to design a robust model that performs well across multiple metrics, and uses interpretability analysis to elucidate the prediction results. This study introduces a predictive framework for learning achievement based on ensemble learning techniques. Specifically, six distinct machine learning models are utilized to establish a base learner, with logistic regression serving as the meta learner to construct an ensemble model for predicting learning achievement. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) model is then employed to explain the prediction results. Through the experiments on XuetangX dataset, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified. The proposed model outperforms traditional machine learning and deep learning model in terms of prediction accuracy. The results demonstrate that the ensemble learning-based predictive framework significantly outperforms traditional machine learning methods. Through feature importance analysis, the SHAP method enhances model interpretability and improves the reliability of the prediction results, enabling more personalized interventions to support students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.