Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745924›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2025

On brain stimulation in epilepsy.

Andrew J Trevelyan, Victoria S Marks, Robert T Graham, Timothy Denison, Andrew Jackson, Elliot H Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Brain Network Signature of Autoscopic Phenomena in Humans.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Special Issue: Molecular Research in Epilepsy and Epileptogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J TrevelyanNewcastle University Biosciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9307-4241
Victoria S MarksInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Robert T GrahamInstitute of Neurology, University College London, Queens Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Timothy DenisonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Andrew JacksonNewcastle University Biosciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Elliot H SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain stimulation has, for many decades, been considered as a potential solution for the unmet needs of the many people living with drug-resistant epilepsy. Clinically, there are several different approaches in use, including vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation of the thalamus, and responsive neurostimulation. Across populations of patients, all deliver reductions in seizure load and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy risk, yet do so variably, and the improvements seem incremental rather than transformative. In contrast, within the field of experimental neuroscience, the transformational impact of optogenetic stimulation is evident; by providing a means to control subsets of neurons in isolation, it has revolutionized our ability to dissect out the functional relations within neuronal microcircuits. It is worth asking, therefore, how preclinical optogenetics research could advance clinical practice in epilepsy? Here, we review the state of the clinical field, and the recent progress in preclinical animal research. We report various breakthrough results, including the development of new models of seizure initiation, its use for seizure prediction, and for fast, closed-loop control of pathological brain rhythms, and what these experiments tell us about epileptic pathophysiology. Finally, we consider how these preclinical research advances may be translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

BrainDeep Brain StimulationEpilepsyAnimalsHumansOptogeneticsVagus Nerve Stimulationbrain-machine interfaceepilepsyfeedback controlneuromodulationoptogeneticsseizure

Identifiers

PMID39745924
PMCPMC11884764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.