ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Partial replacement of the tricuspid valve using cryopreserved tricuspid homograft: 20-year outcomes.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stented Biological Prosthesis Versus Mitral Allograft in Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is limited consensus on the optimal strategy for surgical treatment of severe tricuspid valve pathology. At our institution, we have implemented a unique technique of using a tricuspid homograft with its supporting apparatus for partial replacement of the native tricuspid valve. We now present the long-term outcomes of these patients.
methodsWe analysed a cohort of patients who underwent partial tricuspid valve replacement using tricuspid homograft. Yearly clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed. Fine-Gray methods were used to estimate freedom from death and reoperation and reverse Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate follow-up.
resultsFourteen patients were included (age range 15 days to 73 years). Indications included congenital anomalies (n = 9, 64%) and infective endocarditis (n = 5, 36%). The median follow-up was 17 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 10-21 years). Two patients (14%) died due to causes unrelated to the primary tricuspid valve surgery, and three (21%) underwent redo tricuspid valve operations. In the remaining cohort, seven (50%) were asymptomatic and two (14%) reported class II dyspnoea, while none had severe tricuspid regurgitation on echocardiogram. Estimated freedom from death was 93% at 10 years and 83% at 15 and 20 years, while estimated freedom from reoperation was 77% at 10, 15 and 20 years.
conclusionsPartial replacement of the tricuspid valve using tricuspid homograft tissue effectively restores the anatomical conformity of the native tricuspid valve and has durable long-term survival and freedom from severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients with congenital anomalies and infective endocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.