Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745847›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025

Budget impact of aripiprazole once every 2 months long-acting injectable for adult patients with bipolar I disorder in the United States.

Vakaramoko Diaby, Shubhram Pandey, Vassiki Sanogo, Reem Dhayan Almutairi, Yagyesh Kanoria, Soma S Nag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vakaramoko DiabyGlobal Value and Real-World Evidence, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Shubhram PandeyPharmacoevidence, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Vassiki SanogoPharmacoevidence, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Reem Dhayan AlmutairiPharmacoevidence, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Yagyesh KanoriaUS Tech Solutions, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Soma S NagGlobal Value and Real-World Evidence, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBipolar disorder is a severe recurrent, episodic psychiatric condition with a worldwide prevalence of approximately 1%, affecting more than 5 million adults in the United States in 2020. A subtype, bipolar I disorder (BP-I), which accounts for approximately one-quarter of cases, is associated with impairments in psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Recommended treatment options include daily oral, or long-acting injectable, antipsychotics, including the aripiprazole once every month formulation, which has been shown to improve adherence compared with oral treatments. A new formulation of aripiprazole for administration once every 2 months ready to use (Ari 2MRTU) has been shown to have similar efficacy to monthly treatment, with only 6 doses annually.

objectiveTo estimate the financial impact of introducing the new formulation of aripiprazole as a treatment option for adults diagnosed with BP-I in the United States.

methodsA cohort of eligible patients with BP-I was selected from a hypothetical US health plan of 1 million members, and the treatment costs modeled with a 3-year time horizon, in scenarios with or without the addition of Ari 2MRTU. Inputs into the model included user-definable estimates of the current and projected market share of the available antipsychotics, forecast uptake of aripiprazole new formulation, acquisition, initiation, and administration costs, hospitalization costs, time on treatment, and patient adherence. The budget impact was estimated as the difference in the annual cost for the total cohort for the current and new scenarios, the cost per member per month, and the cost per treated member per month. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were also conducted to examine the extent to which the model results were affected by variations in individual input parameters.

resultsThe total budget impact of introducing a formulation of Ari 2MRTU as maintenance monotherapy for treating a cohort of eligible patients with BP-I in the United States from a health plan of 1 million members was estimated to be $898,930 over 3 years, representing a per member per month cost saving of $0.025 and a per treated member per month cost saving of $2.43. The sensitivity analysis supports a modest reduction in budget, with the main driver being adherence with medication regimen.

conclusionsThe introduction of Ari 2MRTU as a maintenance treatment for adults with BP-I is expected to have a neutral effect on payer budgets in the United States and is a potentially favorable option for patients who prefer less frequent dosing.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBipolar DisorderBudgetsDelayed-Action PreparationsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CostsFemaleHumansInjectionsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedModels, EconomicAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

PMID39745847
PMCPMC11695839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.