ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gestational misalignment with fixed exposure windows: the potential dangers of zero-filling in distributed lag models.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss (PL) is a critical public health concern. However, PL is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or nongeneralizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about PL by using more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births (ie, live-birth-identified conceptions [LBICs]). We simulated 10 years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and 2 nitrogen dioxide (NO2)-PL relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the 2 NO2-PL relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of CIs captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live-birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, we found that higher prenatal NO2 exposure was associated with more PLs. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of PL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.