Trial reportJAMA oncology2025
Transplant-Free Approach in Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02927769 (Risk-based, Response-adapted, Phase II Open-label Trial of Nivolumab + Brentuximab Vedotin), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk-based, Response-adapted, Phase II Open-label Trial of Nivolumab + Brentuximab Vedotin (N + Bv) for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD30 + Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) After Failure of First-line Therapy, Followed by Brentuximab + Bendamustine (Bv + B) for Participants With a Suboptimal Response (CheckMate 744: CHECKpoint Pathway and Nivolumab Clinical Trial Evaluation)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Immune checkpoint therapy in pediatric and adolescent lymphomas.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma: should all patients receive an autologous stem cell transplant? - the CON.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Role of radiotherapy in refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Subsequent Neoplasm Risk After Modern Mediastinal Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Insights From a Multi-Institutional Children's Oncology Group Trial.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in paediatric, adolescent and young adults with primary refractory or relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A national multicentre real-world study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Evolution of therapeutic paradigms in Hodgkin lymphoma: from "cure-oriented" to "functional cure".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Less may be enough: a transplant-free future for low-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Retrieval strategies for children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) aim to maintain efficacy while minimizing long-term toxic effects. Children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk, relapsed cHL may benefit from replacing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant with less intensive involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT). Objective: To evaluate a risk-stratified, response-adapted, transplant-free approach for treatment of children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk relapsed cHL with nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin (BV) followed by BV plus bendamustine for patients with suboptimal response and ISRT (30.0 to 30.6 Gy). Design, Setting, and Participants: CheckMate 744 (R1 cohort) was a phase 2, nonrandomized, single-arm study enrolling children, adolescents, and young adults aged 5 to 30 years with low-risk cHL between September 25, 2017, and December 16, 2020, across the US, Canada, and Europe. Data were analyzed from September 2017 to November 2022. Exposures: Patients received 4 cycles of nivolumab plus BV induction; patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) received an additional 2 cycles of nivolumab plus BV while patients with suboptimal response received 2 cycles of BV plus bendamustine intensification. Patients with CMR after induction or intensification received ISRT consolidation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified coprimary end points were CMR rate (Lugano 2014 classification) any time before ISRT and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, per blinded independent central review (BICR). Results: Of 28 included patients treated in the low-risk cohort, 18 (64%) were female, and the median (range) age was 17 (6-27) years. At a median (range) follow-up of 31.9 (2.2-55.3) months, CMR per BICR any time before ISRT was 93% (26 of 28; 90% CI, 79.2-98.7; objective response rate [ORR], 100%), and 23 of 28 (82%) achieved CMR per BICR after 4 cycles of nivolumab plus BV (ORR, 96.4%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS and progression-free survival rates at 3 years were 87% (3 of 18; 90% CI, 69.5-94.7) and 95% (1 of 18; 90% CI, 76.7-99.0), respectively. During induction, 22 patients (79%) had treatment-related adverse events, including 7 with grade 3 or 4 adverse events, 2 with anemia, 1 with neutropenia, and 6 with immune-mediated adverse events. Serious adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 2 patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized clinical trial found that for children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk, relapsed cHL, a transplant-free, risk-adapted, response-based approach with nivolumab plus BV and ISRT offered high CMR rates and high 3-year EFS rate, with a safety profile consistent with that of each agent used. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927769.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.