Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745737›Full record

Observational studyJAMA surgery2025

De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Neslihan Cabioglu, Havva Belma Koçer, Hasan Karanlik, Mehmet Ali Gülçelik, Abdullah Igci, Mahmut Müslümanoglu, Cihan Uras, Baris Mantoglu, Didem Can Trabulus, Giray Akgül and 33 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07643584 (DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07643584 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2026 to 2031Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAxillary Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Axillary management in patients with cN + breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pattern of practice in Italy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Can neoadjuvant chemotherapy be replaced with immune checkpoint blockade combined with dual anti-HER2 antibodies for HER2-enriched breast cancer?Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors.

Neslihan CabiogluBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Havva Belma KoçerDepartment of General Surgery, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Hasan KaranlikDivision of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mehmet Ali GülçelikDivision of Surgical Oncology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Abdullah IgciBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mahmut MüslümanogluBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cihan UrasDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Baris MantogluDepartment of General Surgery, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Didem Can TrabulusDepartment of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Istanbul Samatya Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Giray AkgülDivision of Surgical Oncology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mustafa TükenmezBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Kazim SenolDepartment of General Surgery, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye.
Enver ÖzkurtDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Demiroğlu Bilim University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ebru SenDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Güldeniz Karadeniz ÇakmakDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Türkiye.
Süleyman BademlerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Selman EmirogluBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nilüfer YildirimDepartment of General Surgery, American Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Halil KaraDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet DagDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye.
Ece DilegeDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayse AltinokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Altınbas University, Bahçelievler Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Gül BasaranDepartment of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Altunizade Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ecenur VarolDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Ümit UgurluDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Yasemin BölükbasiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Yeliz Emine ErsoyDepartment of General Surgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Baha ZengelDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Niyazi KaramanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Serdar ÖzbasBreast and Endocrine Surgeon, Private Practice, Ankara, Türkiye.
Leyla ZerDepartment of Surgery, Ataşehir Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Halime Gül KiliçBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Orhan AgcaogluDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Gürhan SakmanDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.
Zafer UtkanDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Aykut SoyderDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Altunizade Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Alper AkcanDepartment of General Surgery, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Sefa ErgünDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ravza YilmazDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Adnan AydinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Atilla SoranDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kamuran IbisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Vahit ÖzmenBreast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative). Design, Setting, and Participants: In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated. Exposure: Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated. Results: A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥ .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39745737
PMCPMC11904723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.