Observational studyJAMA surgery2025
De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.
Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07643584 (DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oncologic Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Targeted Axillary Dissection for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing axillary surgery for patients with clinically node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Equivalent survival in targeted axillary dissection compared to axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Clinical fluorescent probes: mechanisms, advantages and inspirations.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Routine biomarkers map response probability in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and dual HER2 blockade.BMC cancer · 2026Observational
- Reply to: "Letter to the Editor Regarding Abdulla HA, McGarry J, Kaczorowska R, et al. Oncologic Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Targeted Axillary Dissection for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" by Montagna et al.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Stained region lymph node biopsy for axillary restaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in node-positive breast cancer: a cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Axillary management in patients with cN + breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pattern of practice in Italy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Clipped Node Pathology as a Guide for Limited Axillary Surgery in Occult Breast Cancer.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Oncological outcomes with and without axillary lymph node dissection in patients with residual micrometastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OPBC-07/microNAC): an international, retrospective cohort study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2026Article
- Can neoadjuvant chemotherapy be replaced with immune checkpoint blockade combined with dual anti-HER2 antibodies for HER2-enriched breast cancer?Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
- The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Impact of pre-neoadjuvant radioactive iodine seed marking on pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
- Oncologic First Events in Breast Cancer Patients After Targeted Axillary Dissection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Axillary management in the post-neoadjuvant setting: dual tracer vs. single tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Is the Clipped Node Enough? Successful Retrieval and False Negative Rate of the Clipped Node After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Factors Predicting Additional Residual Nodal Disease With a Metastatic Sentinel Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- An Overview of the Importance of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients: From the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society of Breast Surgeons.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative). Design, Setting, and Participants: In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated. Exposure: Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated. Results: A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥ .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.