Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745699›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Cardiovascular Disease and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Ivan Angelov, Allen M Haas, Elizabeth Brock, Lingfeng Luo, Jing Zhao, Benjamin D Smith, Sharon H Giordano, Nicholas J Leeper, Kevin T Nead

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Error in Table.JAMA network open · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivan AngelovDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Allen M HaasDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Elizabeth BrockDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Lingfeng LuoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Sharon H GiordanoSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Nicholas J LeeperDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kevin T NeadDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Impact of clonal hematopoiesis mutations on toxicity and outcomes following oncologic therapyK08CA263313 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NEAD, KEVIN THOMAS · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA263313NCI NIH HHS L30 CA253796NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are the leading causes of mortality in the US. Large-scale population-based and mechanistic studies support a direct effect of CVD on accelerated tumor growth and spread, specifically in breast cancer. Objective: To assess whether individuals presenting with advanced breast cancers are more likely to have prevalent CVD compared with those with early-stage breast cancers at the time of diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based case-control study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked databases from 2009 to 2020. The analysis was completed from May 2023 to August 2024. Participants were female patients aged at least 66 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Cases were matched with controls by breast cancer stage at diagnosis and propensity scores using factors known to be associated with delayed cancer diagnosis. Exposure: Prevalent CVD prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was the odds of locally advanced (T3-4 or N+) or metastatic (M+) breast cancer status at diagnosis. Results: The full analytic cohort included 19 292 matched individuals, with median (IQR) age 73 (70-79) years, of whom 1676 (8.7%) were Black and 16 681 (86.5%) were White; 9478 individuals (49.1%) had prevalent CVD. Propensity score-matched, multivariable-adjusted models found that individuals with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis had statistically significantly increased odds of prevalent CVD (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P = .007). This association was observed among hormone receptor-positive (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .006) but not hormone receptor-negative (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; P = .83) breast cancer. ORs were directionally consistent when separately examining locally advanced (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .02) and metastatic (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.94-1.54; P = .15) disease, among all receptor subtypes. Conclusions and Relevance: This case-control study found that individuals with more advanced breast cancer at diagnosis were more likely to have prevalent CVD. This finding may be specific to hormone receptor-positive and ERBB2-negative (formerly HER2) disease. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and investigate interventions to improve patient outcomes, including personalized cancer screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesNeoplasm StagingAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39745699
PMCPMC11696447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.