Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745698›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2025

Glutamatergic Medications for Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

David R A Coelho, Chen Yang, Armiel Suriaga, Justen Manasa, Paul A Bain, Willians Fernando Vieira, Stefania Papatheodorou, Joshua D Salvi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David R A CoelhoHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chen YangHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Armiel SuriagaHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Justen ManasaHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paul A BainCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Willians Fernando VieiraDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Stefania PapatheodorouDeparment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joshua D SalviCenter for OCD and Related Disorders, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Funding

Fostering Research Mentorship and Training During Psychiatry ResidencyR25MH135837 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MAURIZIO FAVA, ISABEL TERESA LAGOMASINO · 2024 to 2026
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH135837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) encompass various neuropsychiatric conditions that cause significant distress and impair daily functioning. Although standard treatments are often effective, approximately 60% of patients may not respond adequately, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic approaches. Objective: To evaluate improvement in OCRD symptoms associated with glutamatergic medications as monotherapy or as augmentation to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, with a focus on double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Data Sources: Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on October 16, 2024, without date limits. Study Selection: Two investigators independently screened records to identify double-blind RCTs comparing glutamatergic medications with placebo for patients with OCRDs regardless of age, sex, gender, or refractoriness. Abstracts, study protocols, non-English studies, and trials involving augmentation to psychotherapy were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted and synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on type of OCRD, population, refractoriness of OCRD, augmentation strategy, risk of bias, and type of glutamatergic medication. Sensitivity analysis was performed using a leave-one-out approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: Improvement in OCRD symptoms was measured by standardized mean difference (Cohen d). Improvement in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms was measured by mean difference (reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS] scores). Results: A total of 27 RCTs (1369 participants; mean [SD] age, 31.5 [7.8] years; 65.6% female) were included. Glutamatergic medications showed a large effect size in improving OCRD symptoms (Cohen d = -0.80 [95% CI, -1.13 to -0.47]; low certainty of evidence). In the 23 OCD-specific RCTs, glutamatergic medications demonstrated a significant mean reduction in Y-BOCS scores (mean difference, -4.17 [95% CI, -5.82 to -2.52]; moderate certainty of evidence). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings indicate that glutamatergic medications may be effective in treating OCRDs, particularly OCD. However, high heterogeneity and potential publication bias necessitate cautious interpretation. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to explore dose-dependent effects, additional OCRD subtypes, and other promising glutamatergic medications.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdultExcitatory Amino Acid AgentsFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeExcitatory Amino Acid AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39745698
PMCPMC11696454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.