ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025
Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesPhysicians-in-training (residents, fellows) and advanced practice providers (APPs) receive limited education on sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). They often assess patients first. We aimed to understand their views on OSA and screening for OSA in the perioperative period.
methodsElectronic-mail surveys were sent to physicians-in-training and APPs, in 5 categories of practice (anesthesiology, internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology/gynecologic oncology, and surgery) at 9 major institutions. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests evaluated associations between participant characteristics (clinical role, physician years of training, APP years of practice, categories of practice) and survey responses (perception of OSA, perioperative risk factor, screening/managing of perioperative OSA) stratified by institution. False discovery rate (FDR) adjustment accounted for multiple comparisons (FDR-adjusted-
resultsWe received 2,236/6,724 (33.3%) responses. Almost all (97%) agreed OSA represents a risk factor for perioperative complications. Many (37.9%) were unaware which screening tool was used at their institution, with differences by clinical role (FDR-adjusted-
conclusionsSignificant differences exist in screening by clinical roles and categories of care. This highlights the importance of improving provider education on the role of OSA in perioperative risk assessment and patient care. CITATION: Lyons MM, Auckley DH, Mokhlesi B, et al. Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.