Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745450›Full record

ReviewExpert review of endocrinology & metabolism2025

Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States.

Sarita Pathak, Paxton Voigt, Margot Bellon, Susan T Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P Quinn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarita PathakHealth Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Paxton VoigtDepartment of OBGYN, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, NY, USA.
Margot BellonCollege of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilHealth Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Gwendolyn P QuinnDepartment of OBGYN, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, NY, USA.

Funding

LOvE (LGBT Oncofertility Education) ECHOR25CA142519 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Gwendolyn P Quinn, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2011 to 2026
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA142519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncidence rates for cancer among adolescent and young adults (AYA) have increased 30% since 1970. Declines in mortality underscore the importance of discussing fertility preservation (FP) options prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatments. National guidelines outline FP options including oocyte (OC), embryo (EC), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for female AYA patients. Significant progress has led to changes in FP practices, initially limited to EC. Subsequently, OC was deemed non-experimental in 2013, followed by OTC in 2020. Despite these advancements and guideline recommendations, the availability and utilization of FP services vary. AREAS COVERED: Rapid review methodologies were employed to classify trends in female AYAs utilization of FP cryopreservation options following guideline updates. FP options reviewed include OC, EC, and OTC. Additionally, the review examined if aspects of the decision-making process relevant to FP were present. EXPERT OPINION: Ten articles met inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the declassification of OTC has not necessarily increased its use and OC and EC appear to be most frequently used. The factors associated with decision making appear to have remained consistent with financial constraints having the most impact, followed by partner status and concerns about recurrence.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsAdolescentCryopreservationDecision MakingFemaleHumansUnited StatesYoung AdultEmbryo cryopreservationfertility preservationoncologyoocyte cryopreservationovarian tissue cryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID39745450
PMCPMC13251570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.