Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745438›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025

The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.

Jui-En Lo, Christopher N Schmickl, Florin Vaida, Shamim Nemati, Karandeep Singh, Scott A Sands, Robert L Owens, Atul Malhotra, Jeremy E Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Challenges for predicting oxygen response in OSA.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Seeing the random forest for the Zzz's: machine learning's new role in sleep science.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jui-En LoDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Christopher N SchmicklDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Florin VaidaSchool of Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Shamim NematiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Karandeep SinghDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Scott A SandsDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert L OwensDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Atul MalhotraDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Jeremy E OrrDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.

Funding

Is Obstructive Sleep Apnea Important in the Development of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG063925 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
Underlying mechanisms of obesity-induced obstructive sleep apneaR01HL148436 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Atul Malhotra · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Sleep Apnea Endophenotypes: One Size Does Not Fit AllR01HL154926 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
The cardiovascular consequences of sleep apnea plus COPD (Overlap syndrome)R01HL166485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Atul Malhotra · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
VentNet: A Real-Time Multimodal Data Integration Model for Prediction of Respiratory Failure in Patients with COVID-19R01HL157985 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL, NEMATI, SHAMIM · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
Developing a Diverse Next Generation of Leaders in Respiratory ScienceT32HL166127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Laura Elise Crotty Alexander, Atul Malhotra · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Acetazolamide to Improve Clinically Important Outcomes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients with a High Loop Gain EndotypeK23HL161336 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Christopher Nikolaus Schmickl · 2022 to 2026
$863k
The Impact of Sleep Disordered Breathing in People who use OpioidsK23HL151880 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ORR, JEREMY ELLIOT · 2021 to 2025
$849k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL151880NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL161336NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148436NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154926NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157985NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166485NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL166127NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea; however, some people have residual respiratory events or require significantly higher CPAP pressure while on therapy. Our objective was to develop predictive models for CPAP outcomes and assess whether the inclusion of physiological traits enhances prediction.

methodsWe constructed predictive models from baseline information for subsequent residual apnea-hypopnea index and optimal CPAP pressure. We compared models utilizing clinical variables with those incorporating both clinical and physiological factors. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of regression vs machine learning. All performances, including root mean square error, R-squared, accuracy, and area under the curve, were evaluated using a 5-fold cross validation with 10 repeats.

resultsFor predicting residual apnea-hypopnea index, random forest models outperformed regression models, and models that incorporated both clinical and physiological variables also outperformed models using only clinical variables across all performance metrics. Random forest using both clinical features and physiological traits achieved the best performance. In both regression and random forest models, central apnea index is found to be the most important feature in predicting residual apnea-hypopnea index. For predicting CPAP pressure, there was no additional predictive value of physiological traits or random forest modeling.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrated that the combined use of clinical and physiological variables yields the most robust predictive models for residual apnea-hypopnea index, with random forest models performing best. These findings support the notion that prediction of obstructive sleep apnea therapy outcomes may be improved by more flexible models using machine learning, potentially in combination with physiology-based models. CITATION: Lo J-E, Schmickl CN, Vaida F, et al. The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureMachine LearningSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyapnea-hypopnea indexcontinuous positive airway pressureCPAP pressuremachine learningobstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID39745438
PMCPMC12048318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.