Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744922›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

Exclusion of people from oncology clinical trials based on functional status.

Nicole D Agaronnik, Mary Linton B Peters, Lisa I Iezzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole D AgaronnikHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-2351
Mary Linton B PetersDivision of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa I IezzoniDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Cost Effectiveness of Germline Genetic Testing in Pancreatic CancerK08CA248473 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PETERS, MARY LINTON B · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA248473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPeople with disability have higher rates of cancer, excluding skin cancer, compared with people without disability. Food and Drug Administration draft guidelines from 2024 address use of performance status criteria to determine eligibility for clinical trials, advocating for less restrictive thresholds. We examined the exclusion of people with disability from clinical trials based on performance status and other criteria.

methodsWe reviewed eligibility criteria in approved interventional Phase III and Phase IV oncology clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrails.gov between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2023. Functional status thresholds were assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale and Karnofsky Performance Scale in clinical trial eligibility criteria. Qualitative analysis was used to review eligibility criteria relating to functional impairments or disability.

resultsAmong 96 oncology clinical trials, approximately 40% had restrictive Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and Karnofsky Performance Scale thresholds, explicitly including only patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1, or equivalent Karnofsky Performance Scale 70 or greater. Only 20% of studies included patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 and Karnofsky Performance Scale 60. Multiple studies contained miscellaneous eligibility criteria that could potentially exclude people with disability. No studies described making accommodations for people with disability to participate in the clinical trial.

conclusionDraft Food and Drug Administration guidelines recommend including patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 2 and Karnofsky Performance Scale scores of 60 in oncology clinical trials. We found that oncology clinical trials often exclude people with more restrictive performance status scores than the draft Food and Drug Administration guidelines, as well as other criteria that relate to disability. These estimates provide baseline information for assessing how the 2024 Food and Drug Administration guidance, if finalized, might affect the inclusion of people with disability in future trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFunctional StatusNeoplasmsPatient SelectionPersons with DisabilitiesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationclinical trialsdisabilityPerformance status

Identifiers

PMID39744922
PMCPMC12199287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.