Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744906›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2025

Automated Cone Beam Computed Tomography Segmentation of Multiple Impacted Teeth With or Without Association to Rare Diseases: Evaluation of Four Deep Learning-Based Methods.

Eloi Sinard, Laurent Gajny, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Rufino Felizardo, Gauthier Dot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eloi SinardUFR Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Laurent GajnyInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Paris, France.
Muriel de La Dure-MollaUFR Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Rufino FelizardoUFR Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-6272
Gauthier DotUFR Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-2623

Funding

Fédération Française d'Orthodontie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).

resultsThe patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.

conclusionAll the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTooth, ImpactedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultcomputer‐assistedcone beam computed tomographydeep learningimpactedorthodonticssurgerytooth

Identifiers

PMID39744906
PMCPMC12056468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.