ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
Individualized Dosing of Efgartigimod in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Clinical Experience at a Single Center.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis: A meta-analysis of different antibody subtypes.Immunologic research · 2026Pooled it
- ADAPT NXT: Fixed Cycles or Every-Other-Week IV Efgartigimod in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Steroid-Sparing Effect of Efgartigimod in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Study Protocol for a Single-Arm, Open-Label Clinical Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Oral Corticosteroid and Nonsteroidal Immunosuppressant Therapy Use in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Receiving Ravulizumab, Eculizumab, or Efgartigimod in the USA.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing efgartigimod dosing patterns and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living outcomes in clinical practice: results from a large patient support program database.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of a Multivariable Model to Predict Early Minimal Symptom Expression Response in Adult Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Patients Treated With Efgartigimod.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Telitacicept as an alternative to non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a study on clinical efficacy and steroid-sparing effect.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsNeonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors represent a promising treatment option for patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG); however, data on clinical use are limited. The aim of this report is to describe one center's approach to efgartigimod dosing in patients with gMG.
methodsMedical records of patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) gMG whose symptoms were not adequately controlled by oral medications and/or intravenous immunoglobulin who received efgartigimod between January 2022 and January 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. The first three efgartigimod cycles (10 mg/kg IV) were initiated at fixed intervals (4 once-weekly infusions, with 4 weeks between cycles). After the third cycle, initiation of subsequent treatment cycles and time between cycles were determined individually by clinical evaluation. Effectiveness was measured by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale. Adverse events and changes to concomitant therapies were monitored.
resultsNineteen patients were included and received a mean of 4.4 efgartigimod cycles, including two patients who discontinued after two cycles. All patients exhibited a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL total score from baseline to the end of the last cycle, with a mean improvement of 5.8 points. Seven (37%) patients achieved minimal symptom expression (MSE, MG-ADL 0-1). From baseline to the end of the last cycle, daily prednisone dose was decreased or it was discontinued, while two patients initiated prednisone. Efgartigimod was generally well tolerated. DISCUSSION: This approach to efgartigimod dosing resulted in substantial MG-ADL score improvement in these patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG as well as reduced daily dose and/or discontinuation of concomitant corticosteroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.