ArticleStroke2025
Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.
Article in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Models for Bilingual Aphasia: A Systematic Review of Language Deficit Research with a Focus on Code-Switching and Translation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A theoretically driven and empirically grounded calculation for language dominance and degree of multilingualism.Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Evidence for an integrated bilingual language system from discourse tasks in aphasia.Aphasiology · 2026Article
- Evidence for an Integrated Bilingual Language System from Discourse Tasks in Aphasia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Digital Therapies for Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Navigating the Complexity of Bilingual Aphasia: Current Insights and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Machine learning models in post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting treated language improvement (TLI) and transfer to the untreated language (cross-language generalization, CLG) after speech-language therapy in bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia is crucial for personalized treatment planning. This study evaluated machine learning models to predict TLI and CLG and identified the key predictive features (eg, patient severity, demographics, and treatment variables) aligning with clinical evidence.
methodsForty-eight Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia received 20 sessions of semantic feature-based naming treatment in either their first or second language. Comprehensive language, cognitive, and background bilingual experience assessments were administered pre- and post-treatment. Sixteen curated features spanning demographics, language abilities, cognition, and bilingual experience were used as inputs to 6 machine learning algorithms to predict treatment responders versus nonresponders and CLG vs no CLG.
resultsThe top 2 machine learning models achieved F1 scores of 0.767±0.153 for TLI and 0.790±0.172 for CLG. Interpretability analyses revealed that aphasia severity in the trained language, education, and cognitive performance were key predictors of TLI. Aphasia severity in the untreated language and cognitive performance emerged as influential features of CLG. These aligned with expectations based on prior literature.
conclusionsFor the first time, machine learning models reveal that factors such as patient severity and demographics predict TLI and CLG after therapy in Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia. Consideration of both treated and untreated language severity, as well as cognitive assessment performance, when forecasting treatment outcomes in an underserved population such Spanish-English stroke survivors, can meaningfully impact their short-term and long-term clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.