ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Treatment Decision-Making Among Chinese Americans With Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International Variation in Preoperative SNOT-22 Scores: A Scoping Review and Exploratory Analysis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere has been limited research on the influence of race and ethnicity on treatment decision-making for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This prospective study aims to investigate potential factors linked to treatment modality choice among patients with medically refractory CRS, distinguishing between Chinese American and non-Chinese American patients.
methodsCRS patients with persistent symptoms despite prior medical treatment were prospectively enrolled. These patients chose either to continue medical treatment or to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to alleviate CRS symptoms. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using bivariate analysis. The association between ethnicity and treatment modality choice was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsAmong the 134 patients (29.1% Chinese Americans) included, 79 patients (59.0%) elected to undergo ESS. No significant differences in demographics, nasal polyp status, comorbidities, Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Mackay, or modified Lund-Kennedy scores were found between the treatment groups. After adjusting for age, income, and SNOT-22 score, non-Chinese American patients were more inclined to select ESS (OR = 7.92; 95% CI: 2.95-21.28; p < 0.001) as opposed to Chinese American patients. Chinese American patients who underwent ESS had a clinically significant improvement in SNOT-22 scores at 1 month (-11.29 points) and 3 months (-16.29 points) postoperatively.
conclusionsChinese American patients with refractory CRS are less likely to opt for ESS compared to non-Chinese American patients. Surgical treatment is effective in improving quality of life, as measured by the SNOT-22, among Chinese American CRS patients. Further investigations are warranted to identify factors contributing to surgical hesitancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 135:1920-1927, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.