ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
Multimodal sleep staging network based on obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MFSleepNet: An Interactive Multimodal Fusion Framework for Automatic Sleep Staging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Differential effects of auto-adjusting vs. fixed continuous positive airway pressure on sleep continuity during the first night of PAP in obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automatic sleep staging is essential for assessing sleep quality and diagnosing sleep disorders. While previous research has achieved high classification performance, most current sleep staging networks have only been validated in healthy populations, ignoring the impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) on sleep stage classification. In addition, it remains challenging to effectively improve the fine-grained detection of polysomnography (PSG) and capture multi-scale transitions between sleep stages. Therefore, a more widely applicable network is needed for sleep staging. Methods: This paper introduces MSDC-SSNet, a novel deep learning network for automatic sleep stage classification. MSDC-SSNet transforms two channels of electroencephalogram (EEG) and one channel of electrooculogram (EOG) signals into time-frequency representations to obtain feature sequences at different temporal and frequency scales. An improved Transformer encoder architecture ensures temporal consistency and effectively captures long-term dependencies in EEG and EOG signals. The Multi-Scale Feature Extraction Module (MFEM) employs convolutional layers with varying dilation rates to capture spatial patterns from fine to coarse granularity. It adaptively fuses the weights of features to enhance the robustness of the model. Finally, multiple channel data are integrated to address the heterogeneity between different modalities effectively and alleviate the impact of OSA on sleep stages. Results: We evaluated MSDC-SSNet on three public datasets and our collection of PSG records of 17 OSA patients. It achieved an accuracy of 80.4% on the OSA dataset. It also outperformed the state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy, F1 score, and Cohen's Kappa coefficient on the remaining three datasets. Conclusion: The MSDC-SSRNet multi-channel sleep staging architecture proposed in this study enhances widespread system applicability by supplementing inter-channel features. It employs multi-scale attention to extract transition rules between sleep stages and effectively integrates multimodal information. Our method address the limitations of single-channel approaches, enhancing interpretability for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.