Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744662›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2024

Sinan Çetin, Mediha Uğur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sinan ÇetinDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-9354
Mediha UğurDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-397X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Materials and Methods: Adult patients with signs of acute gastroenteritis and gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI PCR) panel tests performed on stool material, and Results: A total of 59 patients with Conclusion: CDI is important because of its frequent occurrence and potential for fatal outcomes. It is crucial to identify patients at risk for recurrence. In our study, the development of CDI attacks in the intensive care unit, malignancy, and continuation of antibiotic treatment for non-CDI infection after CDI diagnosis were found to be associated with recurrence. Evaluating these parameters in patient follow-up will contribute to prognostic assessment.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficilediarrheaPCRrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39744662
PMCPMC11687231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.