ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2024
Development and validation of a risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting stillbirth and identifying key maternal risk factors using machine learning.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Risk factors for neural tube defects in the war and siege-affected tigray regional state of ethiopia: a case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A Composite Risk Scoring Model for Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Pre-Eclampsia- A Pilot Study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings. Methods: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities. Results: Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.