ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
From laboratory to field: cross-domain few-shot learning for crop disease identification in the field.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analyzing the enhancement of CNN-YOLO and transformer based architectures for real-time animal detection in complex ecological environments.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Lightweight Cross-Domain Few-Shot Plant Disease Recognition Through Target-Domain Statistical Calibration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Few-shot crop pests and diseases recognition based on adversarial augmentation and task interpolation.Plant methods · 2026Article
- F2DMAS: a smartphone video-based 3D phenotyping workflow for potted plants in complex backgrounds.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- EDISP: a hybrid CNN-ViT framework for robust maize leaf disease detection and classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Knowledge-enhanced large language model construction for garlic cultivation using GraphRAG.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few-shot learning (FSL) methods have made remarkable progress in the field of plant disease recognition, especially in scenarios with limited available samples. However, current FSL approaches are usually limited to a restrictive setting where base classes and novel classes come from the same domain such as PlantVillage. Consequently, when the model is generalized to new domains (field disease datasets), its performance drops sharply. In this work, we revisit the cross-domain performance of existing FSL methods from both data and model perspectives, aiming to better achieve cross-domain generalization of disease by exploring inter-domain correlations. Specifically, we propose a broader cross-domain few-shot learning(CD-FSL) framework for crop disease identification that allows the classifier to generalize to previously unseen categories and domains. Within this framework, three representative CD-FSL models were developed by integrating the Brownian distance covariance (BCD) module and improving the general feature extractor, namely metric-based CD-FSL(CDFSL-BDC), optimization-based CD-FSL(CDFSL-MAML), and non-meta-learning-based CD-FSL (CDFSL-NML). To capture the impact of domain shift on model performance, six public datasets with inconsistent feature distributions between domains were selected as source domains. We provide a unified testbed to conduct extensive meta-training and meta-testing experiments on the proposed benchmarks to evaluate the generalization performance of CD-FSL in the disease domain. The results showed that the accuracy of the three CD-FSL models improved significantly as the inter-domain similarity increased. Compared with other state-of-the-art CD-FSL models, the CDFSL-BDC models had the best average performance under different domain gaps. Shifting from the pest domain to the crop disease domain, the CDFSL-BDC model achieved an accuracy of 63.95% and 80.13% in the 1-shot/5-shot setting, respectively. Furthermore, extensive evaluation on a multi-domain datasets demonstrated that multi-domain learning exhibits stronger domain transferability compared to single-domain learning when there is a large domain gap between the source and target domain. These comparative results suggest that optimizing the CD-FSL method from a data perspective is highly effective for solving disease identification tasks in field environments. This study holds promise for expanding the application of deep learning techniques in disease detection and provides a technical reference for cross-domain disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.