ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
The daily minimum leaf turgor pressure can represent the water status of apple trees under drip irrigation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Water status diagnosis in greenhouse drip-irrigated tomato and celery using leaf turgor dynamics and machine learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate diagnosis of the water status of fruit trees is a prerequisite for precise irrigation. Measurement of leaf turgor pressure provides a means to explore the water utilization mechanisms of fruit trees and their responses to water stress. However, there are few studies on the use of daily minimum leaf turgor pressure (Ppmax) to indicate water information in apple tree. Methods: We monitored Ppmax, stem flow rate (Vstem), leaf water potential, soil water, and the main meteorological factors under two drip irrigation levels (fully irrigated and under-irrigated) to elucidate the temporal dynamics of the daily leaf turgor minimum of apple trees and diagnose the water status of fruit trees. Results: The results showed that soil water deficiency could reduce leaf turgor pressure and increase Ppmax. In both years, the signal intensity and sensitivity of Ppmax were better than those of Vstem, and the sensitivity was 3.31 and 2.94 times of Vstem, respectively. Compared to Ppmax, Vstem had a higher correlation with meteorological factors and was more affected by meteorological conditions, independent of irrigation treatment. Ppmax was significantly negatively correlated with soil and leaf water potential, and its correlation coefficient was 2.58-4.89 times higher than that between Vstem and both. Discussion: These results not only enhance our understanding of the water regulation strategies employed by apple trees under drought conditions but also provide a theoretical foundation for developing efficient water-saving practices and precision irrigation strategies for fruit trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.