ArticleJournal of Cancer2025
The causal association between neutrophil counts and the risk of lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increased neutrophil level in the blood is considered a risk factor for lung cancer (LC). However, establishment of causality is hampered by the inconsistent findings of observational studies. This study aimed to explore the causal association between neutrophil counts (NC) and LC risk in two populations via two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The inverse-variance weighted method was used to evaluate causality. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the stability of the results. Bidirectional MR analysis was performed to check reverse causality, and a multivariable MR analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding factors. The results revealed a significant causal relationship between NC and LC (OR=1.027, 95% CI: 1.005-1.050,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.