Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

The association between type 1 diabetes mellitus and the risk of immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study.

Chun-Hua Zhang, Yang Shen, Su-Mei Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun-Hua ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yang ShenDepartment of Nephrology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Su-Mei ZhaoDepartment of Nephrology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential causal relationship between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) to deepen understanding of the association between these two conditions and to provide a scientific basis for future preventive and therapeutic strategies. Methods: This study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as genetic instrumental variables (IVs), to assess the association between T1DM and IgAN. The analytical approaches included univariable and multivariable MR, along with sensitivity analyses such as Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO), to evaluate the impact of heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Results: Univariable MR analysis using the IVW method revealed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.009 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.032-1.206] for the association between T1DM and IgAN. Adjusted results from multivariable MR analysis indicated a significant relationship between T1DM and increased risk of IgAN; for example, after adjusting for triglycerides (TG), the OR was 1.534 (CI: 1.213-1.543). After adjustment for HOMA-IR, the OR was 1.303 (CI: 1.149-1.198). Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger regression intercept testing ( Conclusion: The findings suggest that T1DM is a factor in increasing the risk of IgAN, enhancing our understanding of the potential relationship between T1DM and IgAN and providing possible biological pathways for future disease prevention and intervention.

Indexed as

genome-wide association studiesIgA nephropathyMendelian randomizationsingle nucleotide polymorphismstype 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39744534
PMCPMC11690302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.