Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744508›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in network physiology2024

The constrained-disorder principle defines the functions of systems in nature.

Yaron Ilan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in network physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yaron IlanFaculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Constrained Disorder Principle (CDP) defines all systems in nature by their degree of inherent variability. Per the CDP, the intrinsic variability is mandatory for their proper function and is dynamically changed based on pressures. The CDP defines the boundaries of inherent variability as a mechanism for continuous adaptation to internal and external perturbations, enabling survival and function under dynamic conditions. The laws of nature govern the world's natural phenomena and underlie the function of all systems. Nevertheless, the laws of physics do not entirely explain systems' functionality under pressure, which is essential for determining the correct operation of complex systems in nature. Variability and noise are two broad sources of inherent unpredictability in biology and technology. This paper explores how the CDP defines the function of systems and provides examples from various areas in nature where the CDP applies, including climate, genetic, biology, and human behavioral variabilities. According to the CDP, system malfunction results from inappropriate performance of the boundaries of inherent variability. The environment influences the physiological variability, and species interactions influence eco-evolutionary outcomes. The CDP defines human behavior as being driven by randomness and accounts for malfunctions and their corrections. The paper reviews variability-based CDP algorithms and CDP-based second-generation artificial intelligence systems and their potential for improving systems' prediction and efficiency by using variability.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiological noisecomplexitycomplex systemsdisorderlaw of physicsvariability

Identifiers

PMID39744508
PMCPMC11688203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.