ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2025
Friction knot terminology is inconsistent in veterinary surgery.
Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2025
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the nomenclature for friction knots commonly used by veterinary surgeons. Veterinary surgeons certified by the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) or the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) were recruited through email listings available on the websites of veterinary schools and the ACVS to participate in a survey on this subject. Participation was also solicited through the ACVS Facebook page, the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery, and the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. The survey included questions about 4 knot-tying videos. Complete responses were received from 160 veterinary surgeons. Familiarity with the knots ranged from 26% (constrictor knot) to 54% (miller's knot). The modified miller's knot and the miller's knot were correctly named by a majority of surgeons (61% and 63%, respectively). There was no consensus for the constrictor knot, with the greatest number of respondents identifying it as the constrictor knot (38%) or the miller's knot (31%). There was also no consensus for the strangle knot, with respondents split among identifying it as the miller's knot (39%), modified miller's knot (34%), or strangle knot (21%). There is apparent disagreement on the names of surgical friction knots among veterinary surgeons. Many participants indicated that they were not familiar with the knots demonstrated in the videos. Inconsistent terminology may impede educational efforts and hinder clear communication about types of knots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39744463PMC11665728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.