ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Development of a complex intervention to prevent complications in patients recovering at home after transcatheter aortic valve replacement by optimizing home-based cardiac rehabilitation processes: a Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a management protocol for high-risk neurogenic bladder in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a Delphi study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to systematically develop a nurse-led complex intervention to enhance the quality of and adherence to home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) care for patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The intervention integrated stakeholder perspectives, expert insights, empirical evidence, and theoretical frameworks. Methods: We initially searched for initial cardiac rehabilitation strategies based on the "Behavior Change Wheel" model and literature review. The Delphi method was used in three rounds of consultations. The guidelines for the Conducting and Reporting of Delphi studies were also followed. The Delphi panel consisted of 15 experts in rehabilitation medicine, clinical medicine, cardiovascular nursing, behavioral science, community nursing, geriatric nursing, and nursing management from various provinces and cities in China. Panelists were asked to rate the effectiveness of HBCR strategies on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A questionnaire was sent to the members of the expert panel via email. The consensus from 15 experts led to the development of a framework in round 3. The response rates for the three rounds were 88.23, 100.00, and 100.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients for all rounds were 0.95. The Kendall coefficients obtained in the three rounds were 0.09, 0.78, and 0.87, respectively. Conclusion: A set of strategies was developed for a comprehensive HBCR program for patients with TAVR, which can provide practical methods for relevant government departments, healthcare professionals, and patients' families. Future research should investigate the experiences of stakeholders and assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing these strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.