ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2024
Enteral Feeding in Patients With Open Abdomen and Negative Pressure Therapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Contemporary management of the open abdomen: standards, challenges, and future directions.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Early supplemental parenteral nutrition and risk of subsequent enteroatmospheric fistula in high-risk open abdomen patients with persistent enteral nutrition intolerance: a landmark propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In critically ill surgical patients treated with open abdomen and negative pressure therapy (OA/NPT), the association between nutritional support and clinical outcome is still controversial. The main objective of this study was to assess the effect of enteral nutritional support during the acute phase (i.e., the first 7 days) on clinical outcome (abdominal wall closure rate or fistula formation) in critically ill surgical patients treated by OA/NPT. Methods: Over a 5-year period, every critically ill patient who underwent nutritional support while treated by OA/NPT was retrospectively included. The main study outcome was a composite criterion, defined as delayed abdominal closure ≥8 days and/or secondary abdominal complications (secondary anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess and fascial dehiscence). Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was derived from a propensity score model. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association between clinical outcome and different modalities of nutritional support (enteral nutrition vs. nil per os during the first week after OA/NPT, early vs. late enteral nutrition, normal vs. low caloric/protein intake). Results: Over the study period, 171 patients were included and 50% underwent delayed abdominal closure and/or secondary abdominal complications. The rate of delayed abdominal closure or secondary abdominal complications was significantly lower in patients who received enteral nutrition versus those who remained nil per os (40% vs. 61%, Conclusion: In critically ill patients with OA/NPT, the use of enteral feeding within 7 days after surgery was associated with better clinical outcome. Further studies are mandatory to better define the adequate timing for enteral feeding, the energy needs and the protein requirements during the acute phase after OA/NPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.