Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744279›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Advancing Innovation in Medical Presentations: A Guide for Medical Educators to Use Images Generated With Artificial Intelligence.

Mhd Firas Safadi, Obada Zayegh, Zakaria Hawoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mhd Firas SafadiDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Annaberg Teaching Hospital, University of Leipzig, Annaberg-Buchholz, DEU.
Obada ZayeghCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, GBR.
Zakaria HawootDepartment of Neurology, Gummersbach Teaching Hospital, University of Cologne, Gummersbach, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimedia learning theory suggests that the use of images in the classroom enhances both cognitive and constructive learning. Finding the appropriate images for medical presentations can be challenging due to copyright and privacy issues. Artificial intelligence (AI) image generation is a newly available technology that offers a great advantage to medical educators. This technical report presents a robust guide for beginners to learn how to effectively use AI to generate images relevant to their presentations using free tools. The 12 guide tips include adhering to multimedia theory, using cost-effective resources, recognizing the possibilities, learning the technique, mastering the jargon, expanding the natural language, using prompt templates, creating stories, employing humor, avoiding perfection, exploiting the versatility of applications, and recognizing the limitations and ethical issues. By working through the article and the supplementary material, readers will be able to produce images similar to those provided in the article and use them effectively in their medical presentations.

Indexed as

ai-generated imagesartificial intelligencemedical educationmedical lecturesmedical presentationsmedical storytellingmultimedia learning theorymultimedia principlesmultimedia theorypowerpoint presentation

Identifiers

PMID39744279
PMCPMC11692014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.